Friday, September 28, 2018

The Cracked.com Cartoons that Changed Me

This Cracked article from 5 years ago by Winston Rowntree, 5 Reasons Your Online Dating Profile Isn’t Working, in particular the cartoons, stuck in my head so well that I spent an hour looking for it just now. I think about some of these all the time, and I sincerely think they made me a better person. Like
image
And
image
and
image
And this one from another article:
image
Damn. This guy is uncommonly thoughtful and compassionate!
Here’s his Instagram and looks like there’s lots of other good stuff on tumblr

Monday, September 24, 2018

Into the Woods, Then Out of the Woods, and Home Before Dark!

You've changed
You're thriving
There's something about the woods
Not just
Surviving
You're blossoming in the woods...
- It Takes Two, Into the Woods

This weekend was DeepMind Darkwood, the erotic hypnosis retreat in western Massachusetts. It was the second time I've gone. My last time was 5 years ago. A lot of stuff has happened in that time!

My first time was within my first year of knowing that hypnokink exists, and it was my first hypno con of any kind - I wouldn't go to my first NEEHU until the following March. I was in way, way over my head. I came in without any play partners or good friends, I had barely ever hypnotized anyone, and I was just freaking out most of the time. (I looked up my old blog entry to remember the date, but I don't dare read it!) I still found it mindblowing and valuable, but this time I was so much better positioned to dive into its cultish charms.

This time I knew so many more people, including close friends from the Boston scene (thank you again DigitalSwitchGamine and AndSleep for the ride!) and most of all I got to share it with my wife khatsha.

40 people in a wooden lodge in a big clearing in the woods, 36 hours, no classes, mostly collective activities. There is nothing remotely like Deepmind. Every year LeeAllure and MrDream set out to engineer a very specific atmosphere, that might not work for everyone, but which I found both cozy and invigorating - a wonderful invitation to relax, open up, and try new and scary things.

Scary things: yes there were still occasional moments of anxiety and missed connections, and we certainly put to use our couple skills of calming each other down (that get heavily exercised at every con - cons are the greatest, but also stressful!). But we came out having learned new things about ourselves and each other.

Some of the best moments, and achievements of Lee and Dream that I want to call out:
  • Opening and closing ceremonies. Simple yet lovely, they grounded me in the present and made me feel connected to everyone.
  • Something called the word cloud (?), which is hard to describe but involved people running around in the dark on the lawn yelling things that are part of hypnokink like "DOLL PLAY!" or "ORGASMS!" and it gave me warm feelings.
  • Speed trancing! I'd avoided that in the past at NEEHU, but now that I've done it, I see it is genius the way they set it up, and we are going to steal it for BEHIVE. I had so many great hypnotic encounters and so many good conversations in a short span of time - each one only 6 minutes.
  • Plentiful and delicious food along with cozy communal dining, signalled by a dinner bell that brought me right back to summer camp.
  • Breaking into groups and creating group trance activities, for three of the modalities, which took up the bulk of the day on saturday. It's really striking how little there was that felt like a class, and it made me realize how I can sometimes get into passive, cautious, overintellectual mode sitting in classes at Charmed, NEEHU etc, rather than putting energy into creating new things, both 1 on 1 and in groups. Deepmind insists that you come to do.
  • For one such activity, digitalswitchgamine's droning collective "sound bath", which definitely felt just as cultish as I wanted the weekend to be. Any lost tourist happening up the road just then would definitely have been justified guessing they were were about to see or be part of ritualistic murder.
  • Outfits! So many people brought their A game and showed just how alluring they can be. The 15 minutes it took for two of us, using half a tube of lube, to get khatsha into her latex dress? Well. Fucking. Worth it.
  • My performance at (alcohol-free) dizzy bat, which I can confidently call the worst ever, wherein I ran in a tight circle and fell down possibly having recrossed the starting line
  • Gorgeous weather. That wasn't their doing (I think??), but we got lucky with a couple of perfect golden September days outdoors in Massachusetts. Even the route there and back was beautiful.
Amidst all that khatsha and I got to watch and do some wonderfully twisted and pleasurable scenes, and enjoy many quiet moments of togetherness with likeminded pervs.

Thank you to the organizers, the volunteers, and everyone who came and made it so special!

Saturday, September 1, 2018

When We Said Our Default Is To Believe Accusations, We Meant It

In the BEHIVE consent and conduct policy, we wrote "Our default approach is to believe accusations unless there is powerful evidence to the contrary." This caused some consternation and objection from one person. He compared it to the satanic panic of the 80s and falsely imprisoned anti-war activists of the 1960s.

Later, he backed off and apologized, saying "I have been reassured that the statement means that any and all accusations will be taken as seriously as possibly and investigated, thoroughly." Another observer agreed, "With some very subtle changes the meaning could have been more clearly presented to eliminate any confusion."

We did not mean that. We meant what we wrote.

We don't intend to conduct investigations.

We are not investigators.

We don't have the training. Or resources such as background checks or ability to subpoena evidence. We have no desire to build a formal investigative procedure. Not to mention that in the case of consent violations, legalistic questioning is often retraumatizing, and sharing information with the accused can put the accuser in danger.

Even if we could conduct thorough investigations, in most cases there would remain a fog of uncertainty. Very many consent violations don't have witnesses except the people involved.

With all the information in the world - which we will not have - you still have to make a call. And we choose, by default, to make the call to believe the accuser.

This is different from the legal system! It makes sense that the legal system should require an assumption of innocence, with the burden of proof on the accuser. We do not. The key difference being, and I can't stress this enough, that one involves going to jail, and the other, not getting to go to a dinner.

Positive, lively kinky atmospheres are so fragile. I have seen them wither and die because of only a couple of individuals, and those events continue on, dead. Zombie events. I've seen people show up at an event, smell the decay, and turn right around and walk out, never to come back. And that's a good scenario, compared to the one where an event becomes a hunting ground for serial predators.

We built the BEHIVE executive, and started our jobs, ready to fight for the atmosphere. The need to deal with consent violations and creepiness doesn't take us by surprise. That would be like a hotel manager not being ready for shit-clogged toilets - it's a horrible part of the job, but it's the job. And since all of society is weighted towards dismissing assault reports, the best way to do our job, and deal with that shit, is to believe accusations, the first time.

That said, of course we're going to use our intelligence. Even though we don't consider false reports to be a big problem relative to actual cases of assault (when it comes to rape, the Journal of Forensic Psychology estimates about 20 true ones for every false one, and that's based on law enforcement reports), it's happened. And of course rules can be gamed, consent rhetoric can be weaponized. (and if you don't believe that, you've never seen someone accused of an assault turn around and accuse the accuser) So nothing is automatically triggered by an accusation. We make a decision by having a discussion, and then taking a vote.

That vote is among the five of us on the executive. Three are femme, and three are people that primarily bottom. That means that even if I turn out to relate a bit too much to an accused person who is like me, an older male dom, I can be outvoted. By people who each have more than enough experience with being creeped on.

All this is designed to weight things towards believing accusations, and taking action. If this stance rubs you the wrong way, start your own club! I'm serious about that! All you have to do is click "Create new event", and then call a restaurant.

The only other part is, who will show up? My friend Jukebox says, if you don't ban consent violators, you are effectively banning the people they drive away. Will you be left with just the thickest-skinned event attendees? The ones who are not from any vulnerable minorities? The ones we banned?

For the people we most want, hopefully this all sounds good, but words are not that useful - watch our actions. Over a long period of time. If you make a report, see how we react to it. But here are some actions the BEHIVE exec has taken in its first six months, besides write a consent and conduct policy:
  • We've added three previous munch attendees to our ban list, and sent one official warning.
  • We created an anonymous reporting form, and we've discussed reports at every executive meeting.
  • We created Google docs to accumulate reports and observations about people, even minor ones, so that people can be banned for patterns of subthreshold behaviour.
A different person, who has never been to one of our events, wrote to us: "I think that your group is very concerned with rules and laws and control, and not so much about considering the humanity of people." I disagree: I think that we are using explicit rules and laws (which include, by the way, such laws as "Be nice") to express our intention to protect the humanity of our spaces. It's an agonizing, painful thing to ban someone, but not to do it is to fall into geek fallacy #1, and to fail the amazing people we might not even get to meet.

We are doing our absolute best not to make mistakes. But, inevitably, we will. We're going to ban people who shouldn't be banned, and not ban people who should be. All this is just to say: we want to risk making more of the first kind of mistake than the second.

And that's what we meant.

(this is a personal essay, not a BEHIVE statement, but it was read by the other four executive members)